OpenAI’s mathematical paper release will continue
Sam Altman expressed empathy for mathematicians upset about AI, while saying OpenAI would not slow its science-paper blitz. The release drew both excitement and concern from researchers.

Key takeaways · 4
- 01
The release contained 722 preprints and 372 distinct results.
- 02
OpenAI said it would contribute $5 million to a Simons Foundation initiative supporting mathematicians working with AI results.
- 03
Science reported that 300 of the 719 papers left after withdrawals and revisions had been formalized in Lean.
- 04
Lean formalization does not by itself verify that a paper’s English-language claim is correct.
A large release of mathematical results
OpenAI released more than 700 AI-generated mathematical preprints on 6 October.[3] Science reported the release contained 722 preprints covering 372 distinct results.[4] According to the company, an unreleased ChatGPT model attempted about 4,000 problems.[4] OpenAI said the vast majority of solutions took an average of the equivalent of three hours of ChatGPT Pro “thinking.”[4] The figures describe different measures: the number of attempted problems, the number of preprints, and the distinct results covered.[4]
Funding and tools for researchers
OpenAI said it would contribute $5 million to a Simons Foundation initiative supporting mathematicians working with AI results.[5] The foundation will manage and award the funding for workshops, conferences, and special programs.[5] OpenAI also said it would provide models and computing resources to researchers supported by the foundation.[5] The company published its mathematical results in a GitHub repository with protocols for revisions and citations, and said it would add more formalizations as they became available.[5] OpenAI said its goal was to provide tools for mathematicians and scientists.[3]
Review and reactions remain part of the picture
As Science went to press, OpenAI said it had withdrawn three manuscripts and revised 14.[4] Of the 719 papers left after those changes, 300 had been formalized in Lean, according to Science.[4] Science cautioned that Lean formalization does not by itself verify that a paper’s English-language claim is correct.[4] Reactions among mathematicians were mixed: some celebrated the solutions, while others complained that OpenAI had scooped them.[3] Academics were also calling the release a “giant bomb,” and scientists described the breakthroughs as “really cool and terrible at the same time.”[2]
For mathematical and scientific teams, the release makes review, attribution and verification important parts of deciding how to use AI-generated results. A formal proof in Lean may help with checking, but it should not be treated as confirmation of every claim in a paper.
Why it matters
Bring this to your team — one session a day, built for your industry.
kju.ai is built for teams: daily sessions, team analytics, and rollout support for your organization.
For teamsHow this developed
1 November 2026
OpenAI’s mathematical paper release will continue
Sources
- Sam Altman Says He Has 'Empathy' for Mathematicians Upset About AI - Business Insiderbusinessinsider.com
- Sam Altman says OpenAI won't slow science paper blitz — even though academics are calling it a 'giant bomb' | TechRadartechradar.com
- OpenAI posts 700 maths preprints online: mathematicians are up in arms | Naturenature.com
- OpenAI just changed math forever. Exactly how, no one yet knows | Science | AAASscience.org
- Sharing AI progress in mathematics | OpenAIopenai.com