Court grants final approval of Anthropic copyright settlement
A court granted final approval to a copyright settlement concerning Anthropic’s use of LibGen and PiLiMi to build its book collection. The settlement creates a $1.5 billion fund for eligible copyright owners.

Key takeaways · 4
- 01
The court granted final approval of the settlement, which concerns Anthropic’s use of LibGen and PiLiMi to build its book collection.
- 02
Eligibility is limited to covered books that appear on the Works List.
- 03
The estimated payment is approximately $3,000 per work, but valid claimants receive a pro rata share.
- 04
As of April 16, 2026, claims covered 91.3% of the Works List.
What the court approved
The settlement concerns Anthropic’s use of LibGen and PiLiMi to build its book collection, according to the case description.[2] The court granted the motion for final approval and found the settlement fair, reasonable, and adequate under the class-action rules.[1] The class is not defined as all authors or all copyright owners: it covers owners of books in versions of LibGen or PiLiMi that Anthropic downloaded, provided those works appear on the Works List.[1] For a rights holder assessing whether the settlement applies, the Works List is therefore central to the stated eligibility criteria.[1]
Fund and estimated payments
The court described the settlement as non-reversionary and said it includes a $1.5 billion fund.[1] Its estimated payment was approximately $3,000 per work, which the court said is four times the statutory minimum for ordinary infringement.[1] That figure is an estimate, not a stated fixed payment to every claimant: valid claimants will receive a pro rata per-work share.[1] The settlement also caps class counsel’s attorney-fee request at 25% of the fund, before costs and expenses.[1] The evidence does not specify a final payment amount for any individual claimant.[1]
Claims and what remains outside
As of April 16, 2026, claims had been made for 440,490 of the 482,460 works on the Works List, or 91.3%.[1] The court also reported 350 timely opt-outs covering 1,802 works and 54 objections or comments.[1] Andrea Bartz, Inc., Charles Graeber, and MJ + KJ Inc. were reaffirmed as class representatives.[1] Approval does not release claims about past AI outputs or future conduct, according to the settlement terms described by the court.[1] Those limits are important when distinguishing the approved settlement from claims it leaves unresolved.[1]
The settlement sets a substantial fund and an estimated per-work payment, while tying eligibility to a defined list of works. Copyright owners and organizations assessing exposure or recovery should distinguish that estimate from the pro rata amount ultimately paid and note that claims about past outputs and future conduct are not released.
Why it matters
Bring this to your team — one session a day, built for your industry.
kju.ai is built for teams: daily sessions, team analytics, and rollout support for your organization.
For teamsHow this developed
1 November 2026
Court grants final approval of Anthropic copyright settlement