Citi and Bank of America restrict AI agents from customer accounts
Citigroup and Bank of America have become the latest US banks to restrict AI agents from accessing client accounts. The concern includes agents moving idle cash to pursue higher returns, potentially draining deposits.

Key takeaways · 4
- 01
Citi and Bank of America are restricting AI agents’ access to client accounts; assess account access as a potential constraint when planning agent-based financial products.
- 02
Citi says agents need identity verification and authentication before they execute transactions, whether acting for a customer or for the bank.
- 03
Citi’s internal agents must go through ARC, its monitoring and governance platform.
- 04
Do not treat Citi’s internal controls as the same policy as JPMorgan’s stated ban on third-party agents.
What the banks are restricting
Citigroup and Bank of America have joined other US banks in restricting AI agents from accessing client accounts.[1] One concern is that an agent could move idle cash to seek higher returns, draining deposits from the bank where the money is held.[1] The reported restrictions matter to products designed to inspect or act on a user’s finances: many compelling use cases depend on an agent being able to see and act on bank accounts.[2] The evidence does not specify the precise access controls Citi and Bank of America are applying.[1]
Citi’s controls and requirements
Citi CEO Jane Fraser said autonomous AI agents need rigorous identity verification and authentication before they can execute transactions.[2] She said those requirements apply whether an agent acts for a customer or for the bank.[2] Citi’s ARC platform is an internal system for monitoring and governing AI agents, and Fraser said agents cannot be created at Citi without going through it.[2] ARC was introduced in 2026 and is mandatory for overseeing Citi’s internal AI agents.[2] Fraser said she was confident Citi could avoid risks associated with uncontrolled agents.[2]
Policies differ across banks
Citi’s emphasis on internal governance is distinct from JPMorgan CEO Dimon’s stated total ban on external AI agents accessing customer accounts.[2] Dimon cited the danger of “rogue agents.”[2] At Charles Schwab, CEO Rick Wurster said the company actively blocks unauthorized agents attempting to move clients’ money, including Meta’s Muse.[3] Wurster also said Schwab does not want customers to give Muse their passwords and let it act for them, citing uncertainty about control and liability.[3] These examples show different stated approaches, not a single uniform bank policy.
The access trade-off for agent makers
Restricting account access may complicate products whose agents need to view and act on a user’s finances.[2] If the largest banks wall off customer accounts, those products lose access to a large part of the market.[2] Governance systems such as ARC also require staff, systems and ongoing monitoring.[2] Citi has been gradually rolling out governed AI systems internally since at least mid-2025, with an emphasis on compliance and oversight.[2] For teams building financial agents, the evidence points to a design tension: useful account actions depend on access, while banks are emphasizing authentication, control and governance.
For professionals building or buying AI agents, access to financial accounts is not simply a product integration question: banks are weighing that access against control, authentication and responsibility for transactions. Planning for restricted access and stronger governance can help teams make more realistic decisions about product scope and deployment.
Why it matters
Test yourself on this story — 1 question.
Create a free account to take the quiz, earn XP, and get a daily session built for your industry.
Take the quizHow this developed
17 October 2026
Citi and Bank of America restrict AI agents from customer accounts