Skip to main content

California bill restricts AI-only worker discipline

22 OCTOBER 2026·2 MIN READ·3 SOURCES

California approved the No Robo Bosses Act of 2026, which would bar employers from relying solely on automated decision systems to fire or discipline workers. The law is scheduled to apply beginning July 1, 2027.

California bill restricts AI-only worker discipline

Key takeaways · 5

  • 01

    Prepare for the July 1, 2027 start date: employers may not rely solely on automated decision systems to fire or discipline workers.

  • 02

    When these systems assist with a termination or disciplinary decision, the bill requires human oversight and verification.

  • 03

    Employees may request a description of their own data primarily used by a system for a disciplinary or termination decision.

  • 04

    Check whether a system falls within the law’s definition; tools such as spam filters, firewalls, antivirus software, calculators and databases are excluded.

  • 05

    Review whether an exception applies, including a qualifying collective bargaining agreement that explicitly waives the law’s provisions.

What the bill changes

The legislation is SB 947, named the No Robo Bosses Act of 2026 and authored by Sen. Jerry McNerney.[2] Starting July 1, 2027, it would bar California employers from relying solely on an automated decision system to fire or discipline workers.[1][2] When a system assists with those decisions, the bill requires human oversight and verification.[2] International Business Times reports that if technology is the main factor in a decision, an employer must support it with other evidence.[3] The rule therefore distinguishes assistance from allowing a system to make the decision on its own.[2]

Which systems are covered

The law defines an automated decision system as a system that issues simplified output—such as a score, classification or recommendation—to assist or replace human discretionary decision-making and materially affect people.[1] The definition excludes tools including spam filters, firewalls, antivirus software, calculators and databases.[1] For employers reviewing their processes, the important question is whether a tool’s output is used in a covered disciplinary or termination decision, rather than simply whether software is involved.[1] The evidence does not establish that every algorithm or workplace software tool falls within the law’s definition.[1]

Employee rights and employer duties

An employer that primarily relies on an automated decision system for a disciplinary or termination decision must give the affected employee written notice after using it.[1] An employee may also request a description of their own data when that data is primarily used by the system for such a decision.[1] The law bars retaliation against employees for taking specified actions to assert their rights under it.[1] Employers can use these provisions to guide a review of notice procedures, data-request handling and safeguards against retaliation before the law’s start date.[1]

Exceptions, enforcement and passage

The law applies to all cities, including charter cities, but does not apply to parties covered by a qualifying collective bargaining agreement that explicitly waives its provisions.[1] It also preserves certain automated-system uses related to developing aircraft for the national airspace when reasonably necessary to comply with a federal statute, regulation or binding federal contract.[1] The Labor Commissioner may enforce the law, and public prosecutors may bring civil enforcement actions; the law provides for a $500 civil penalty per violation.[1] SB 947 passed the Assembly 53-14 and then the Senate 28-10; the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO, sponsored it.[2]

Organizations can use the time before the law’s start date to identify which employment decisions rely on automated systems and whether human review, employee notices and data-request processes are in place. The practical distinction is between using a system to support a decision and relying on it alone.

Why it matters
Daily session

Bring this to your team — one session a day, built for your industry.

kju.ai is built for teams: daily sessions, team analytics, and rollout support for your organization.

For teams

How this developed

  1. 22 October 2026

    California bill restricts AI-only worker discipline

Sources

AI fluency, one session a day, built for your work.