Skip to main content

Brin says Google is entering an AI self-improvement cycle

18 OCTOBER 2026·2 MIN READ·2 SOURCES

Google cofounder Sergey Brin said the company was starting to enter a cycle in which AI helps build better AI systems, known as recursive self-improvement (RSI). A Google DeepMind safety report, however, found no significant end-to-end acceleration of AI research and development.

Brin says Google is entering an AI self-improvement cycle

Key takeaways · 4

  • 01

    Brin says Google is starting to enter recursive self-improvement, where AI helps build better AI systems.

  • 02

    Google DeepMind’s report found no significant end-to-end acceleration of AI research and development.

  • 03

    More than 75% of Google DeepMind’s production code is AI-written, while changes are reviewed by humans before submission.

  • 04

    The report rated current AI-driven research-and-development risk as low and surveyed 12 senior leaders and researchers.

What Brin described

Brin said Google was starting to enter recursive self-improvement, or RSI, which refers to AI helping build better AI systems.[1][2] He made the comments in a roundtable about the creation of Google’s Gemini 4 model, Argon, with Google’s Josh Woodward, Tulsee Doshi and Melvin Johnson.[2][1] Google shared the roundtable video on a Wednesday.[2] Google released Argon publicly during the week of TNW’s report, which was published on October 17, 2026.[1]

The evidence Brin cited

Brin pointed to Google’s Flash model releases before Gemini 4 as evidence that AI was helping develop successor models.[2] He also said Google would be a couple of models ahead internally by the time viewers watched the video.[1] The idea behind that progression is a flywheel that could speed up the pace of building new models.[2]

Code gains still involve people

Google DeepMind’s Argon safety report said AI agents author a majority of production code and bug fixes, with humans reviewing changes before submission.[1] More than 75% of Google DeepMind’s production code is now AI-written, according to the report.[1] Yet about 88% of pull requests still require repeated human steering or code written by a person.[1] The share of fully delegated pull requests rose from 7.5% in April to 11.9% in September.[1] The report also said humans remain key to choosing research directions, designing experiments and diagnosing training problems.[1]

What the safety report does—and doesn’t—show

Argon solved around half of the challenges in Google’s internal test of AI research tasks.[1] Google tracks Gemini’s improvement with an internal index based on 92 benchmarks.[1] The index’s monthly increase rose from 0.091 points before April 1, 2026, to 0.118 points after that date, but the report said the difference was not statistically significant.[1] Google suspected increased investment and training compute, rather than AI-driven acceleration, might explain the change.[1] The report rated current risk from AI-driven research and development as low and surveyed 12 senior leaders and researchers.[1]

For professionals, the useful distinction is between AI assistance already embedded in development workflows and evidence that AI is accelerating the full research cycle. When considering greater autonomy, weigh the code-generation figures alongside the continued need for human review and the report’s uncertainty about what drove benchmark gains.

Why it matters
Story quiz

Test yourself on this story — 2 questions.

Create a free account to take the quiz, earn XP, and get a daily session built for your industry.

Take the quiz

How this developed

  1. 18 October 2026

    Brin says Google is entering an AI self-improvement cycle

Sources

AI fluency, one session a day, built for your work.