Americans see AI growth benefits but doubt job creation
Axios and CivicScience released a monthly index of Americans’ views on AI. Its October results show positive sentiment about AI’s effect on economic growth, but negative sentiment about its ability to create jobs.

Key takeaways · 4
- 01
The index is intended as a monthly measure and covers views on AI’s effects on jobs, quality of life, society and economic growth.
- 02
October polling included more than 7,300 adults and ran from Oct. 1 through Oct. 26.
- 03
Economic growth sentiment was +10, while sentiment about AI creating more jobs was -30.4.
- 04
Axios plans to publish the index on the first Friday of each month starting in December.
A recurring measure of AI sentiment
Axios and CivicScience released the first Axios-CivicScience AI Sentiment Index, designed to measure Americans’ views about AI each month.[1] Its six components cover perceived effects on quality of life, society, jobs and economic growth, as well as support for AI development and new data centers.[1] That range gives readers more than a single overall sentiment figure: it separates views about potential benefits and costs from support for expanding AI infrastructure. Use the component scores to identify which questions matter most for your organization, rather than treating the headline score as a verdict on every AI use.
What October’s numbers show
The October index drew on online polling conducted from Oct. 1 through Oct. 26, with more than 7,300 respondents aged 18 and older.[1] Its overall net sentiment score was 41.8 on a 0-to-100 scale, which Axios describes as broad negativity about AI.[1] The index calculates net sentiment by subtracting negative responses from positive responses.[1] For workplace decisions, the score is best read as a snapshot of public sentiment in that polling period, not as a direct measure of AI’s effects on any one employer or workforce.
Growth optimism does not extend to jobs
Economic growth was the only one of the six components with a positive sentiment score; sentiment about AI’s effect on economic growth was +10.[1] By contrast, the score for “create more jobs” was -30.4.[1] Axios says the results show a gap between what people think AI will do collectively and its individual impact.[1] The job-creation score reflects respondents’ opinions, not a tally of jobs already gained or lost.[2] Employers can use that distinction when discussing AI plans: the poll signals perceptions, not a forecast of a particular organization’s hiring outcomes.
A signal to track, not a jobs tally
More than a quarter of respondents said they had lost a job to AI or knew someone who had.[1] Axios plans to publish the index on the first Friday of each month starting in December.[1] Separate CivicScience polling found that 25% of employed adults were very concerned about AI’s possible effect on their careers, rising to 40% among people in technical roles.[3] Those separate results are not the same as the index’s job-creation score. Teams tracking employee sentiment can compare future index releases with their own workforce feedback, while keeping the measures distinct.
The results point to a communication challenge for organizations adopting AI: public optimism about economic growth can coexist with concern about individual job prospects. Professionals should treat the index as a sentiment signal, and pair it with evidence about their own workforce before making hiring or deployment decisions.
Why it matters
Bring this to your team — one session a day, built for your industry.
kju.ai is built for teams: daily sessions, team analytics, and rollout support for your organization.
For teamsHow this developed
31 October 2026
Americans see AI growth benefits but doubt job creation
Sources
- Axios-CivicScience index: People expect AI to grow the economy, but not jobsaxios.com
- U.S. AI Index Puts Growth Sentiment at +10, Job Creation at -30.4 | EconoTimeseconotimes.com
- New Axios-CivicScience index finds Americans expect an AI boom without the jobscryptobriefing.com
- Workers expect both carrots and sticks in their AI futures | Ipsosipsos.com