AI ejection-fraction measurements better predicted death risk in heart-scan study
Researchers from City St George’s, University of London and University College London found that AI measurements of ejection fraction from cardiac MRI scans predicted death risk slightly better than measurements by experienced clinicians.

Key takeaways · 4
- 01
AI-generated ejection-fraction measurements were slightly but significantly better at predicting increased risk of death than clinician measurements.
- 02
The study included 27,382 patients and recorded 3,458 deaths during an average follow-up of more than five years.
- 03
The AI analyzed a scan in about two to three seconds; the researchers’ earlier work found expert clinicians typically took around 13 minutes.
- 04
Researchers report an approximately 1% patient-level AI error rate and say clinicians should verify results and assess scans in clinical context.
What the study compared
The researchers compared AI-generated ejection-fraction measurements with measurements made by experienced clinicians using cardiac MRI scans.[1] Ejection fraction measures how effectively the heart pumps blood.[1] Doctors use it to inform decisions about heart-failure treatments, implanted devices, procedures to improve blood flow, surgical risk and chemotherapy monitoring.[3] The study was published online on November 2, 2026, and is described in the paper as a retrospective, multicentre, prognostic study.[2]
What the results show
The analysis covered MRI scans from 27,382 patients in the United Kingdom and United States who were being investigated for known or suspected heart conditions.[1] Patients were followed for an average of more than five years, during which 3,458 deaths occurred.[1] AI-derived measurements were slightly but significantly better than clinician measurements at predicting which patients faced increased risk of death.[1] The difference remained significant after the researchers accounted for factors including age and sex.[1] The team described the work as the largest study of its kind.[1]
Speed and clinical oversight
The AI tool analyzed a patient’s scan in approximately two to three seconds.[1] In earlier work, the research team found that expert clinicians typically took around 13 minutes to analyze a scan.[1] The researchers reported an AI error rate of around 1% at the patient level.[3] They said clinicians should verify AI results and interpret scans in their broader clinical context.[1] The findings support using AI as a first-line tool for cardiac MRI analysis, with expert review when needed; the AI was not intended to replace clinicians.[3]
What researchers plan next
The reported improvement in identifying higher-risk patients was small but meaningful, according to the researchers.[3] The team plans to combine AI measurements from heart scans with other tests, particularly electrocardiograms, to detect heart-muscle problems earlier.[3] The researchers said this could allow treatment to begin before lasting damage occurs.[3] The study received funding from an NIHR Clinical Lectureship, the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH and a British Heart Foundation Accelerator Award.[3]
For clinical teams, the results suggest a potential way to make cardiac MRI measurement faster while keeping clinicians responsible for verification and interpretation. The study reports improved prediction, not evidence that AI-led care changes treatment decisions or patient outcomes.
Why it matters
Bring this to your team — one session a day, built for your industry.
kju.ai is built for teams: daily sessions, team analytics, and rollout support for your organization.
For teamsHow this developed
4 November 2026
AI ejection-fraction measurements better predicted death risk in heart-scan study