AI agents prompt a rethink of the business plan
A CIO.com article dated Oct. 20, 2026, argues that organizations should rethink their business plans as AI agents enter the workforce. Kawasaki says leaders should look beyond deploying agents and consider what new work the resulting capacity could make possible.

Key takeaways · 4
- 01
The Creatio report surveyed 608 IT and business decision-makers; 70% said their organizations had moved beyond AI experimentation.
- 02
Seventy-eight percent said their organizations were scaling AI agents across departments or use cases, or expected to do so within a year.
- 03
Kawasaki said 89% expected agents to augment teams, expand capacity or create new roles, while 9% anticipated significant headcount reductions.
- 04
Kawasaki recommends estimating not only saved hours, but what teams could accomplish with them.
Move beyond deploying agents
The CIO.com article’s central argument is that deploying AI agents alone will not distinguish an organization as adoption spreads.[1] Kawasaki urged leaders to ask what their organizations could pursue if employees had more time.[1] He identified possibilities including giving customers more attention, developing promising ideas and offering services that do not currently make economic sense.[1] The proposed shift is from treating agents as a technology rollout to reconsidering business operations, customer needs the organization can address and potential new sources of value.[1]
Survey shows adoption plans
Creatio published the report using responses from 608 IT and business decision-makers.[1] Seventy percent of respondents said their organizations had moved beyond AI experimentation.[1] Another 78% said their organizations were scaling AI agents across departments or use cases, or expected to do so within a year.[1] These figures describe respondents’ reported progress and expectations; they do not establish that every organization has already scaled agents.
Plan for capacity, not assumed job cuts
Kawasaki said 89% of respondents expected AI agents to augment teams, expand capacity or create new roles, while 9% anticipated significant headcount reductions.[1] He cautioned that these workforce expectations do not establish what will ultimately happen to employment.[1] His recommendation is to consider how to use capacity leaders expect agents to free up.[1] Examples include giving service teams more time for complex customer problems, helping sales teams support accounts that previously received little engagement, and allowing operations teams to address persistent backlogs while keeping up with new requests.[1]
Workflow redesign remains a question
McKinsey reported that 80% of respondents said AI improved individual productivity, while 37% reported a positive EBIT impact.[2] It also found that nearly three-quarters of AI high performers said they had substantially redesigned workflows, compared with one-quarter of other organizations.[2] McKinsey said 11% of organizations had reached its “reinvention” horizon, defined as rethinking how work gets done and how value is created.[2] Its report lists agent tasks including research, drafting, coding, analysis, monitoring, summarization, routing and coordination.[2] The figures provide context, not proof that agents alone produce business results.
For leaders, the operational decision is not only where to deploy agents, but what work teams should take on if capacity increases. Treating workforce expectations as forecasts would go beyond the evidence; planning for several possible uses of that capacity can keep business goals, workflow changes and staffing assumptions distinct.
Why it matters
Bring this to your team — one session a day, built for your industry.
kju.ai is built for teams: daily sessions, team analytics, and rollout support for your organization.
For teamsHow this developed
7 November 2026
AI agents prompt a rethink of the business plan